Re:P = NP
by quchen on Wednesday December 04, 2013 @09:07AM
(#6846883)
Which makes me wonder: how do you filter these? In physics it's common practice to ignore papers about Perpetuum Mobiles (excuse the probably incorrect plural), but here we have a topic that is somewhat easy to write good and bad about while still having very high relevance.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Here's two lists of ways to filter. They're heuristics, but they work well.
One for general mathematical proofs: http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=304
One specific to P != NP: http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=458
Two notes on these:
1. On the first one, note also numbers 11 and 12 Scott mentions in the comments.
2. The second is not always so specific to P vs. NP (and indeed has some overlap with the first -- #1 on the second list is a stricter version of #3 from the first). #3 and #4 for instance could be applied to lots of hard open problems, #6 to really any hard open problem, and #5 is basically fully general.