Re:P = NP
by jessaustin on Wednesday December 04, 2013 @06:56AM
(#6846332)
I'm not going to dig into the paper, but I note that the abstract claims a constructive proof. I sort of assume that anyone with such a proof could organize a convincing demonstration by letting a disinterested observer provide a series of random numbers while clicking a stopwatch.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.