https://twitter.com/thegrugq/status/399352954060144640
The author has cited terrorists training manuals elsewhere on his blog, that are apparently available publicly online, dated from as early as 2003 with security guidelines to not use email or talk on cellphones.
TLDR: The adversary can easily stop using email/cellphones to discuss plans. Do they still use email/cellphones for other reasons? Sure most likely, as was shown in Zero Dark Thirty, but not in any meaningful way that can be usefully gleaned from a mass-surveillance approach. Therefore the large investment and privacy trade-offs to the greater society isn't worth it.
From same source as previous comment: https://twitter.com/thegrugq/status/407662098093580288
You succeeded to put 3 different ethnic groups - I should say 2, the last one being an US product - in the same bag and doing then, a misleading association, fucking idiot!
>"Uncrackable encryption is allowing terrorists — Hamas, Hezbollah, al-Qaida and others — to communicate about their criminal intentions without fear of outside intrusion," FBI Director Louis Freeh said last March during closed-door testimony on terrorism before a Senate panel. "They're thwarting the efforts of law enforcement to detect, prevent and investigate illegal activities."
So law enforcement is fine with encryption so long as it's crackable...
[1]http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/tech/news/2001-02-05-binladen...