News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Salesforce $1 Million Hackathon Update - Two Winners by zaroth on Monday December 02, 2013 @05:23PM (#6837006)
I remember reading (some time ago, and I can't find the article now) that YouTube view counters are designed to be probabilistic and "good enough" to give a general idea of the number of views. I don't believe YouTube is providing any particular guarantee on the accuracy of their view counters.

Lock-step global counters, even when you play games like sharding and summing to reduce contention, can still introduce latency and SPOF. But then again, I would have expected any probabilistic counter to only kick in after a certain popularity threshold.

I would hesitate to make any claim that something definitely was not viewed based on anything less than the full HTTP access logs of a self-hosted video.

Re:Salesforce $1 Million Hackathon Update - Two Winners by post_break on Monday December 02, 2013 @05:36PM (#6837092)
3 seconds of video is considered a view to YouTube. I remember seeing it when I got my Partner contract.
Re:Salesforce $1 Million Hackathon Update - Two Winners by tehwebguy on Monday December 02, 2013 @06:25PM (#6837355)
Until 301 views they are live and accurate to the view
Re:Salesforce $1 Million Hackathon Update - Two Winners by girvo on Monday December 02, 2013 @06:03PM (#6837258)
re. View counter becoming probabilistic after a certain amount of popularity: isn't that the "301+ views" thing?