Re:How to Burst the "Filter Bubble" that Protects Us from Op...
by 001sky on Monday December 02, 2013 @12:30PM
(#6835024)
Isn't the root of this problem false dichotomies? The real reason you don't get synthethesis from two opposing views is that there are omitted variables at play, that typically increase the complexity of the solution.
Re:How to Burst the "Filter Bubble" that Protects Us from Op...
by bmelton on Monday December 02, 2013 @12:37PM
(#6835071)
I would agree that's a part of it, but the idea that someone hasn't yet discovered a variable that bears impact on an issue is a far less crucial one than the ability of one's mind to disregard a salient factor as irrelevant.
Without the ability to think critically of an idea that one is endeared to though, none of that matters at all. Meanwhile, the ability to be challenged allows one to accept more variables as relevant than previously.
Re:How to Burst the "Filter Bubble" that Protects Us from Op...
by 001sky on Monday December 02, 2013 @01:34PM
(#6835466)
But you're assuming the variables are omitted due to ignorance. That's usually not the case. The people that profit from false dichotomies are using these constructs (typically) on purpose, to gloss over the ugliness of a situation otherwise, which usually involves some form of political advntage, self-dealing, or personal enrichment.
Re:How to Burst the "Filter Bubble" that Protects Us from Op...
by bmelton on Monday December 02, 2013 @01:38PM
(#6835496)
I was, and I agree that's an issue with the press... but that doesn't mean that this wouldn't still equate to real progress at a personal level.
Re:How to Burst the "Filter Bubble" that Protects Us from Op...
by wismer on Monday December 02, 2013 @04:51PM
(#6836801)
Newsroom started to suck when it became "will they, won't they" relationship crap and its over the top anti-conservatism. Such a fantastic start, though.
Re:How to Burst the "Filter Bubble" that Protects Us from Op...
by wwinter on Monday December 02, 2013 @11:00AM
(#6834418)
100% agreed. The last thing we need is to give a giant helping hand to confirmation bias. I've been rooting for an intelligent "anti-" recommendation system of this sort for so long.
People come to a conclusion, sometimes by informed means, sometimes not, but however we come to it, we generally stick to that conclusion, for better or worse. Once we've reached that conclusion though, we become very bad scientists. We discard data that doesn't fit with our conclusion, or if we can't discard it, attempt to minimize its significance and promote things that do fit our conclusions as more important.
The media panders to their audience, constantly surveying their audience and reactions, and serving up more and more of the news that we're already predisposed to the news we want to hear. Once a certain capture rate has occurred, the news that people choose begins shaping opinions.
Newsroom parodies this somewhat (disclaimer, I love the show, even though its politics disagree with my own), proclaiming that the Fairness Doctrine was unnecessary, and you can deliver hard-hitting news fairly and accurately without it (which may be a true assumption, maybe not), but then they proceed to deliver extremely biased news coverage that is extremely colored by their own politics and beliefs, presented as intellectualism because we're supposed to get the idea that Will McAvoy is the smartest man in whatever room he's in, so all his opinions are informed by sheer fact and wisdom, so we should believe that whatever he says is true because of that.
Despite that coloring, we see in every off-air scene that he's well informed, but terrible at drawing pragmatic conclusions from a given set of facts, belying that the central theme of the show is even possible with the cast of characters as presented.
Back on topic, because I'm rambling terribly, but the brain rewards itself when it finds facts that agree with its pre-existing beliefs. A chemical 'high five' to reaffirm how right it already was, and to reinforce that it made the right decision before, and now the rest of the world is catching up. I don't know that this can be fixed, but I think that the surest way to mitigate it is to disallow it from becoming too set in its ways, to keep it slightly off-guard, and in a constant state of discomfort.
This might kill us in some other way, and it's possible that the brain will just refuse to allow this, or that we'll all become blathering idiots as a result, but i's at least a step in the right direction of preventing a vicious cycle of arbitrary self-affirmation.