Is this code for vigilante justice?
Can you explain?
[0] http://www.reddit.com/r/SheepMarketplace/comments/1rvlft/i_j...
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/apr/22/business/la-fi-tn-re...
In theory, all it needs is one single non-cooperating gambling or dice site: 1) Split your illegal income up into 10 different addresses 2) Use each address for gambling with a 10 percent chance of winning and 1000% return in case of winning 3) Repeat a couple of times.
That's what the thief done. But a user on reddit seemed to track it all the way through the tumbler[1]
[1]http://www.reddit.com/r/SheepMarketplace/comments/1rvlft/i_j...
Now, maybe he could manage the full 96k btc if he used multiple laundries over many months, but that is time he does not have.
Imagine wallets A,B,F,X,Z.
A contains your money.
B contains somebody else's money.
Move the money as follows, 1BTC in each transaction:
A -> F
B -> F
F -> X
F -> Z
Now you have 1BTC in X and in Z, but there's absolutely no way of telling where they came from. All you can say is they came from F. From now on X and Z are anonymous.And then, you can simply sell bitcoins for cash on localbitcoins. It's pretty untraceable.
For instance, let's say that A wants to send bitcoins stolen from G to X and B wants to send other bitcoins to Z. G simply approaches F and says "You stole my bitcoins. As punishment, I'm going to chain you to a mattress in a 6x6 cell until you confess." That leaves F two choices. F can stand for his principles, keep quiet, and serve as an object lesson to all other potential anonymizers.
However, if F doesn't want to slowly go mad from a lack of mental stimulation, then F would probably keep detailed accounting records of each transaction and pass them on to G. G might feel gracious and upgrade F to a 10x10 cell with a window.
Granted, most of these options are available with cash, but you don't have the transaction record which shows you who F is. In this way, bitcoin is easier to trace than cash.
Nawww, that is unrealistic, even for FBI.
You can't possibly track something like that. Most wallets don't have any names attached to them.
And even in this simple example you don't know who F, X and Z are and how to find them. They are just wallet numbers.
Which no one will, on such a short notice. Thus you end up owning both A and B, in which case the mixing is useless.