Re:How to Burst the "Filter Bubble" that Protects Us from Op...
by danielweber on Monday December 02, 2013 @09:35AM
(#6833831)
There should be some kind of ranking algorithm for "the best people on our side for talking to people on the other side." This is often very different from the people that my side enjoys listening to, since that often includes a lot of puffery about how our side is obviously correct to anyone with half-a-brain.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:How to Burst the "Filter Bubble" that Protects Us from Op...
by twobits on Monday December 02, 2013 @04:25PM
(#6836628)
a) The best people of your side, may not be the best people to talk to the other side. Think rhetorics and clarity, vs depth, knowledge and insight.
b) It can be gamed, especially online, by people being moles.
c) There is usually a lot of context, "axioms" that make something "obvious" to you, but are too many to easily say to the other side.
Re:How to Burst the "Filter Bubble" that Protects Us from Op...
by bmelton on Monday December 02, 2013 @10:17AM
(#6834117)
http://www.opposingviews.com/ does a good job here. It lets you see the best arguments from either side at least.
Edit: I dunno what came over me. I had the address transposed in my head. I meant to post a link to debate.org.
Re:How to Burst the "Filter Bubble" that Protects Us from Op...
by judk on Monday December 02, 2013 @10:34AM
(#6834228)
Where? I just paged through and saw a bunch of mildly controversial news headlines (which did seen an intriguing collection of conversation starters, like hard income limits for Medicare), and then a pile of ad spam for "hot celebrity pics" and testosterone for sale.