Re:A search engine that removes the 1 million most popular w...
by drakaal on Wednesday November 27, 2013 @06:56PM
(#6812129)
I don't think that just because a site makes money it is a bad result. If you searched for "Used Jeep Grand Cherokee" Craigslist would be a good result. So would AutoTrader. Both break your rule.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A search engine that removes the 1 million most popular w...
by robertjwebb on Wednesday November 27, 2013 @07:09PM
(#6812199)
I agree - such a search engine would not be as general as Google or Yahoo. But in sacrificing generality it might become better at handling certain types of requests. I am sure that given such a service the community of HN will make light work of finding out what they are :)
Re:A search engine that removes the 1 million most popular w...
by drakaal on Wednesday November 27, 2013 @07:33PM
(#6812292)
Also it would by hypocritical that it would block sites with ads but likely have to use ads to generate revenue.
As the owner of a search engine I can tell you search ain't cheap.
Re:A search engine that removes the 1 million most popular w...
by robertjwebb on Wednesday November 27, 2013 @08:12PM
(#6812457)
Yeah. Also, how do you computationally distinguish between a commercial and non-commercial site? Loads of grey areas.
Re:A search engine that removes the 1 million most popular w...
by drakaal on Wednesday November 27, 2013 @09:08PM
(#6812622)
Our Natural Language / Language Heuristics Engine can do this. We do to a small extent now, we haven't gone whole hog because I'm not sure I agree that commercial sites shouldn't rank. For things we determine to be reference searches we downrank sales pages, for things we determine to be shopping searches we uprank them.
Re:A search engine that removes the 1 million most popular w...
by robertjwebb on Friday November 29, 2013 @07:12AM
(#6819084)
What product are you developing the engine for?