Re:I Am Not Satoshi
by nullc on Wednesday November 27, 2013 @04:54AM
(#6807330)
Well he stopped saying there was no formal security analysis once someone linked him to one, I think. :)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:I Am Not Satoshi
by betterunix on Wednesday November 27, 2013 @11:38PM
(#6813049)
I believe that I responded to that paper at least once. By my memory, the formalization of Bitcoin's security left room for a polynomial time attack on the system. That is a fine restatement of what we already know about Bitcoin, but:
1. It is irrelevant to this thread, because I was only talking about Satoshi's paper.
2. It is not the sort of security people demand out of other cryptosystems. There is a reason nobody uses this:
If someone could link me to the paper in question, I would really appreciate it.
Re:I Am Not Satoshi
by nullymcnull on Thursday November 28, 2013 @08:10PM
(#6817370)
A little late, but I believe this is the paper mentioned:
https://socrates1024.s3.amazonaws.com/consensus.pdf