News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Vote Now: Who Should Be Time's Person of the Year? Edward... by lotsofcows on Tuesday November 26, 2013 @05:30AM (#6800306)
I never understand why USAians refer to Benedict Arnold as a "traitor". It's a really stupid word to bandy about in a civil war. The country was governed by Britain. Everyone who fought against the government was, by definition, a traitor. Using a word with such a definite negative connotation in such a complex environment is either disingenuous or obtuse.

For similar reasons, using the word "traitor" is also stupid in the case of Snowden. Against whom / what was he a traitor? - The government? A branch of the government? The constitution? The people?

Re:Vote Now: Who Should Be Time's Person of the Year? Edward... by Thrymr on Tuesday November 26, 2013 @08:50AM (#6801144)
I wouldn't call Snowden a traitor, but I think the term is perfectly apt for Benedict Arnold. He was a general in one army who defected to the opposing army. That's pretty much the definition of traitor. That doesn't deny your point that all the rebelling colonials were traitors to the British.
Re:Vote Now: Who Should Be Time's Person of the Year? Edward... by lotsofcows on Tuesday November 26, 2013 @11:54AM (#6802471)
From an objective point of view, you're right - I still don't like the term (or the use-case, rather)...