News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Introducing Pond: A New RSS+Atom Syncing Protocol by ArturoVM on Monday November 25, 2013 @09:26PM (#6798686)
Thank you for your feedback (and the links).

Changing "Article" to "Entry"—noted. As for doing away with the custom schema and using the Atom serialization you posted: it's worth noting the protocol is meant to sync with Atom _and_ RSS transparently; to keep things simple and consistent, a middle ground has to be found.

`since_date` is something I'm working on.

Re:Introducing Pond: A New RSS+Atom Syncing Protocol by nl on Monday November 25, 2013 @10:06PM (#6798842)
Atom is a superset of RSS (to be more precise, it's a superset of all the different RSS dialects, properly specified).
Re:Introducing Pond: A New RSS+Atom Syncing Protocol by ArturoVM on Monday November 25, 2013 @10:19PM (#6798901)
True. But there are certain elements that vary greatly between specs (or rather, between spec and... suggested format?). For example, the `person` construct, the `text` construct, etc, which are rather inconsistent and flat in the RSS spec. If it were all fire–and–forget, I could rest at ease knowing it's a superset, but most differences are not additive.