Re:My deadly disease was just a 23andme bug
by mikeash on Monday November 25, 2013 @09:31PM
(#6798711)
Doesn't 100% risk imply that we die immediately? Not really "living" then.
Re:My deadly disease was just a 23andme bug
by tokenizer on Monday November 25, 2013 @09:49PM
(#6798787)
But the 100% innovation would fix that instantly... You broke my horrible if or else argument!
I took it more as being 100% responsible for your actions. But also yielding 100% control of those decisions/creations.
But your point stands. Both options yield death. One instant and real, the other grey and indifferent.
No. They are robots. Robots that know better. How dare you ask such good questions! You now owe us 40$ for violating my authority citizen!
> Lessening risk is far more important than not stifling innovation
Again, would the OP rather live in a world with 100% risk, 100% innovation, or 0% risk, 0% innovation. I know what I'd choose. There's a pretty common theme in some sci-fis that living without risk isn't even life. Something to think about...