News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Silicon Valley Isn’t a Meritocracy by mtrimpe on Monday November 25, 2013 @01:31PM (#6795872)
And what if it's only moderately meritocratic? Or even below average?

I'd love for PG to run an analysis once of what words occur most frequently in flagged posts and their comments.

I don't think you could get a better representation of this community's unspoken biases than that.

I'm also pretty sure you'd find that words like feminism, female, sexism e.a. would feature quite high on the list.

Re:Silicon Valley Isn’t a Meritocracy by newnewnew on Monday November 25, 2013 @01:49PM (#6796024)
Maybe the community has a bias against pointless class warfare. You want to make an effective feminist statement in Silicon Valley? Start with a github profile.
Re:Silicon Valley Isn’t a Meritocracy by wonderzombie on Monday November 25, 2013 @07:16PM (#6798122)
Right, right. Let's skirt past the idea that men may be in any way responsible for the industry they dominate, and focus on the fact that women aren't creating enough GitHub profiles or having enough hackathons.

In addition to shifting the blame, this is a convenient way to avoid taking any sort of responsibility for our own behavior or our peers, so congratulations on squaring that circle.

Re:Silicon Valley Isn’t a Meritocracy by hacker789 on Tuesday November 26, 2013 @11:56AM (#6802480)
This community, like most others, has an unspoken bias against third-wave feminist bullies.

Look what happened to the "Atheism Plus" communities. They have been completely taken over by bigoted "social justice warriors" and their activism.

Completely.

Atheism is almost never discussed. And when it is, it is always discussed in the context of third-wave post-modern feminism. Think I'm lying? Take a look at any Atheism Plus community. Any!

Once a community accepts the tenants of post-modern discourse, it's over.