Re:FOSS and the sublimation of commodity fetishism
by davexunit on Friday November 22, 2013 @10:32AM
(#6781263)
I would be inclined to agree with you. Yes, my post was reactionary, but I don't really feel like expending much effort on an article that calls Jeff Atwood a white supremacist. Sometimes my patience runs thin.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:FOSS and the sublimation of commodity fetishism
by steveklabnik on Friday November 22, 2013 @10:38AM
(#6781331)
Of course, that's just a footnote. But they're calling forth a long tradition of an entire academic field, 'postcolonialism,'[1] which specifically discusses things like how currency, culture, and language were used by colonialist powers in order to subjugate native peoples in their colonies.
I will agree that they didn't provide very much argument there, and I'm not willing to say anything about Jeff's character, but demanding that people only speak English has a history.
I think a flag would have supported your point better than a comment that simply decreases the level of discourse here.
Re:FOSS and the sublimation of commodity fetishism
by moron4hire on Friday November 22, 2013 @11:20AM
(#6781680)
What's particularly funny about the Atwood example is that it's used in an article complaining about heterosexual (among other adjectives) men. I'm about 75% sure I remember Atwood writing about having a boyfriend.