Re:Landmark Senate Vote Limits Filibusters
by talmand on Thursday November 21, 2013 @02:33PM
(#6776843)
Because they only needed a majority to pass the rule change. There wasn't enough opposition to cause a filibuster, which was the point. There was enough opposition to do a filibuster when 60 votes were needed, now that only a majority is needed a filibuster is pointless. Thus, the minority might as well go home if they face a united front from the majority on the specific points this rule change covers.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.