News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Why should we upvote or downvote a comment? by ErrantX on Saturday June 27, 2009 @07:31AM (#676791)
Speaking personally (and I know a few people have said the same in the past) I upvote comments that are constructive or that make a good argument and downvote trollish, rude or "lol" style comments.

Irrespective of if I agree with their message or not.

Examples. Take these to comments I made the other day:

http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=675136

http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=675230

The first was rightfully downvoted because it all but amounted to a rant. In the second I made a much more reasoned point (but with basically the same conclusion as the first) and it got an upvote.

In my eyes that is the HN effect working :)

Although all of that said I have noticed a tendency for upvotes to snowball sometimes - and for some comments to obviously be voted on based on agreement/disagreement *(not that there is a specific rule against that of course!).

Re:Ask HN: Why should we upvote or downvote a comment? by dhimes on Saturday June 27, 2009 @09:07AM (#676825)
I agree that this is the right way to think about it: I upvote comments I think others should read (for benefit, enjoyment, or a well-reasoned counter-argument to my view). Sometimes, however, due to the discussion at hand I simply use the vote to indicate "me, too" -- especially when it's a discussion that seems to be coming to (or trying to) come to a consensus. I certainly don't want to submit an "I agree" comment; I just up-vote. It often seems like I'm up-voting agreement more than the well-reasonedness or interest of the comment, often due to the nature of the topic.

For example, on a "rate my web site" thread where somebody makes a suggestion, and I simply agree, I'll up-vote without adding to the thread.