Mercurial developer responds to "Switch to git?"

Re:Mercurial developer responds to "Switch to git?" by emn13 on Sunday November 17, 2013 @07:39PM (#6751819)

I use SourceTree for git, but I find TortoiseHg is better for mercurial; it's just far more feature complete, with support for almost all mercurial commands and (bundled) extensions.

I'm still somewhat surprised by how poor git gui's are, considering it's the more popular VCS - though SourceTree is certainly one of the better ones.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mercurial developer responds to "Switch to git?" by luastoned on Monday November 18, 2013 @04:36AM (#6753502)

I was really happy when I heard about SourceTree(back then it was not even released yet) but when it finally came out it was bulky to begin with.

TortoiseHg on the other hand always looked nice and clean.

[ Parent | on HN ]