This is huge. It means wind is cheaper than nuclear, even with most subsidies.
We don't need batteries -- Arthur Rosenfeld has done work going way back that shows how distribution isn't a problem for windpower. That's a widespread myth, perpetuated by media echo chambers, funded by big business.
That's all you really need to know to realize this is a storage and distribution problem.
Nuclear, coal, oil, natural gas, geothermal, hydro --- all the ways we currently make power are always available.
For the brief periods where the world's overall wind production is low, if wind ever takes over most of the grid (it probably won't, considering the political dynamics), there is already a very effective storage technology -- liquid hydrogen. It has a practically limitless capacity (just add more tanks), and it avoids the toxicity problem of batteries, and it avoids the materials problem of fuel cells (still, nobody has found something cheap to replace platinum.)
But the simple answer is 'yes'. Hydrogen could make an excellent base for a battery.
Efficient batteries mean more progress than most generation breakthroughs.