News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Great Ivy League Nude Posture Photo Scandal (1995) by yetanotherphd on Thursday November 14, 2013 @09:38PM (#6737350)
So if it was such a bad idea for the women, why did they do it?

When it is better for men to do what they are told than otherwise, you classify it as a benefit. When it is better for women to do what they are told than otherwise, you call it oppression. I'm trying to draw attention to this double standard.

To be clear: neither the men nor women gained directly from having their photographs taken.

Re:The Great Ivy League Nude Posture Photo Scandal (1995) by etfb on Thursday November 14, 2013 @11:22PM (#6737733)
I don't honestly believe it's possible for someone to ask questions like that without a malicious purpose, so I shall refrain from engaging you henceforth. I pray that the women in your life, if you have any, can see what you are -- but I'm fairly sure it's obvious, so I'm not worried.
Re:The Great Ivy League Nude Posture Photo Scandal (1995) by yetanotherphd on Friday November 15, 2013 @01:20AM (#6738050)
My purpose is to get people to question feminism and see outside a very narrow worldview in which women are always victims. In your case, I have failed. And the way you make this argument personal is really pathetic, although not surprising.