News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sanitizing Bitcoin: This Company Wants To Track 'Clean' B... by bjourne on Thursday November 14, 2013 @07:53AM (#6731992)
What's so hard about it? Have a public registry of transactions that are deemed illegal or theft. Refuse to accept transactions by bouncing them back. So if you are the receiver of 1 btc from anyone on the blacklist you have to create a transaction that returns the 1 btc to the sender. If the address doesn't do that, then that address is also put on the blacklist. Since all bitcoin transactions are public, it is trivial to verify whether the receiver of the btc complies or not.

It could work almost exactly like Spamhaus which tracks email spammers (which coincidentally also happens to be pseudonymous) and smtp servers relaying spam.

As long as enough people opt in to the blacklists it would make life very hard for thieves. Whoever controls the blacklist would gain a lot of power yes, but since opting in would be voluntary you could always decide to use a different blacklist.

Re:Sanitizing Bitcoin: This Company Wants To Track 'Clean' B... by mynewwork on Thursday November 14, 2013 @11:13AM (#6733103)
1) Perfect for harassment, repeatedly send .000001 btc to someone, to force them to keep sending it back or be blacklisted

2)What happens when someone using blacklist A accepts payment that looks clean, only to find out they are now blacklisted on list B? No one could use bitcoin for something like ebay transactions, for fear that the payment they received might be blacklisted by some list.

Re:Sanitizing Bitcoin: This Company Wants To Track 'Clean' B... by bjourne on Thursday November 14, 2013 @12:27PM (#6733665)
1. It would be trivial to implement feature in bitcoin clients to automatically bounce transactions from blacklisted addresses.

2. The situation is the same as if someone irl where to accidentally purchase stolen goods. Or as if you where accidentally spamlisted because you forgot to secure your smtp server. Your options would be:

a) Return the bitcoins and clear your status. b) Argue your case with the operators of blacklist B. c) Ignore your blacklisting and just don't do business with those who follow blacklist B. If they blacklist addresses for frivolous reasons, more people will ignore their list and it won't matter if you are on it or not.

A decent client could automatically keep the blacklists updated so it would hardly be any burden for normal users.

Re:Sanitizing Bitcoin: This Company Wants To Track 'Clean' B... by JohnDoe365 on Thursday November 14, 2013 @08:44AM (#6732185)
I consider it a good thing to have but also very tempting for central authorities to set every "legit" owner of bitcoins onto this list. It would be very hard to prove for an individual erroneously on such a list, that he/she is actually not a fraudulent transactor. Once a majority respects that list, the whole Bitcoin system would come to a halt.

While such an attempt should increase trust, this mechanism could be used to destroy it.