News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The future of M:N threading. Parent comment

Re:The future of M:N threading by pcwalton on Wednesday November 13, 2013 @03:55PM (#6728430)
From what I've heard Go is considering moving to this 1:1 model as well, at least on Linux. This is the reason for the Linux patches mentioned in the thread.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The future of M:N threading by fmstephe on Wednesday November 13, 2013 @04:56PM (#6728878)
Can you post a link to some discussion around this? A google didn't turn up anything obvious. Thanks.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The future of M:N threading by dbaupp on Wednesday November 13, 2013 @05:39PM (#6729177)
It's hinted at in the video linked in the email[1]:

> Over the past year we've been looking at how a uniform, performant, synchronous programming model can be implemented across all of Google's core languages (C++, Java, Go, Python), while maintaining compatibility with existing code.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXuZi9aeGTw

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The future of M:N threading by cespare on Wednesday November 13, 2013 @04:44PM (#6728800)
Do you have a source for that?
[ Parent | on HN ]