Re:Snapchat Spurned $3 Billion Acquisition Offer from Facebook
by nilkn on Wednesday November 13, 2013 @03:17PM
(#6728162)
Consumption of ultra-luxury items is one way to look at the difference, but another is your progeny. $20M, if spent frugally and invested well, could certainly ensure the well-being of your immediate children and probably grandchildren as well (not if you blow it on vintage sports cars and jets, though). But a billion or two could keep your family out of work for many, many generations
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Snapchat Spurned $3 Billion Acquisition Offer from Facebook
by qq66 on Wednesday November 13, 2013 @03:51PM
(#6728389)
Why is keeping your family out of work for many generations a good thing?
Re:Snapchat Spurned $3 Billion Acquisition Offer from Facebook
by gammarator on Wednesday November 13, 2013 @11:00PM
(#6730432)
Re:Snapchat Spurned $3 Billion Acquisition Offer from Facebook
by brianpgordon on Wednesday November 13, 2013 @05:24PM
(#6729091)
I wish my grandparents had left me a few million dollars.
Re:Snapchat Spurned $3 Billion Acquisition Offer from Facebook
by praxulus on Thursday November 14, 2013 @02:33AM
(#6731106)
Keeping your family out of work is not the same as giving them the option of not working.
[deleted]
Re:Snapchat Spurned $3 Billion Acquisition Offer from Facebook
by finnh on Wednesday November 13, 2013 @04:11PM
(#6728561)
If you put it in a mattress, sure.
But most (all?) people invest their money at a far higher rate of return than inflation.
Re:Snapchat Spurned $3 Billion Acquisition Offer from Facebook
by gaius on Thursday November 14, 2013 @03:03AM
(#6731202)
Not for a decade or more has this been true. Inflation in the UK is 2.2%. You would be lucky to get that without venturing into equities (which to be fair have done well this year) or property. But energy is up 8%, travel 9%, food 12%, etc. Real inflation is hard to outrun. And markets are prone to bubbles...
Re:Snapchat Spurned $3 Billion Acquisition Offer from Facebook
by sk5t on Wednesday November 13, 2013 @11:58PM
(#6730621)
My intent was to put $20MM or so in perspective: yes, prudent investment could put such an amount to good, long-term use, but it is not so much money that it would be challenging to spend it all within a decade or so. $1Bn is something else entirely, and would require a very concerted effort to squander quickly.