Re:Amazon AppStream
by raphinou on Wednesday November 13, 2013 @02:14PM
(#6727604)
I am surprised the server side is windows. If you stream your app to a device the server platform does not matter, and would have thought linux to be the first choice in that case.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Amazon AppStream
by couradical on Wednesday November 13, 2013 @02:25PM
(#6727730)
That's not entirely the case - the application has to run in the environment, and for legacy apps (which most application virtualization is targeted at) Windows is a pretty decent bet.
On top of that the App-V/XenApp packaging suite are top notch and provide avenues for enterprise integrations. (I'm making a big leap assuming it's built on one of them, but it doesn't really make sense to build from scratch, as interoperability/portability would be a hassle)
Re:Amazon AppStream
by robterrell on Wednesday November 13, 2013 @02:55PM
(#6727995)
They seem to be targeting games, so I bet DirectX support is one big reason for using Windows.
Came here to post exactly this.
I was initially excited, wondering how we could leverage this, but now I'm perplexed by: "currently supports streaming applications from Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2."
I would have thought Linux would have been the optimal server environment too.
Re:Amazon AppStream
by simonebrunozzi on Wednesday November 13, 2013 @03:04PM
(#6728059)
If you are at re:Invent, go to the AWS Booth and talk to the team. They might share details on what else is going to come in the next few months.
Re:Amazon AppStream
by WalterSear on Wednesday November 13, 2013 @07:44PM
(#6729755)
What mass market application uses real-time, high computation computing? Video games.
And windows still owns the PC gaming industry, though that it changing
Re:Amazon AppStream
by evandeaubl on Wednesday November 13, 2013 @02:28PM
(#6727752)
Sounds like what AppStream is going for is Windows applications hosting, with the user I/O being shuttled to a non-Windows device. In that case, Windows Server is the only logical choice.