News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement by bzmwillemsen on Wednesday November 13, 2013 @10:05AM (#6725539)
With respect to government contracts: It would really hurt a company if their detail pricing scheme was released, as a competitor could easily undercut if they had access to that information.

With respect to court documents: It could result is someone getting hurt or a mis-trial due to outside influences (ie. Rob Ford video)

There are obviously many reasons...

Re:Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement by cbr on Wednesday November 13, 2013 @10:10AM (#6725590)

    It would really hurt a company if their detail pricing
    scheme was released, as a competitor could easily
    undercut if they had access to that information
If every company's pricing were public, wouldn't we just have healthy competition?
Re:Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement by chc on Wednesday November 13, 2013 @02:16PM (#6727619)
We would have competition. How healthy it would be is less certain.
Re:Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement by danielweber on Wednesday November 13, 2013 @10:20AM (#6725678)
Government contracts are usually public information already. More than once I've been at a company that sold something to a government agency, and the agency first had to publish what exactly they were buying and give someone else the ability to put in a better bid.
Re:Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement by mpyne on Wednesday November 13, 2013 @01:19PM (#6727148)
Contracts are usually public. Each companies bid for the contract is not, and in fact there are laws against government contracting officers letting such information become public, at least while the contract negotiation phase is still ongoing.