Re:Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement
by cbr on Wednesday November 13, 2013 @10:10AM
(#6725590)
It would really hurt a company if their detail pricing
scheme was released, as a competitor could easily
undercut if they had access to that information
If every company's pricing were public, wouldn't we just have healthy competition?
Re:Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement
by chc on Wednesday November 13, 2013 @02:16PM
(#6727619)
We would have competition. How healthy it would be is less certain.
Re:Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement
by danielweber on Wednesday November 13, 2013 @10:20AM
(#6725678)
Government contracts are usually public information already. More than once I've been at a company that sold something to a government agency, and the agency first had to publish what exactly they were buying and give someone else the ability to put in a better bid.
Re:Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement
by mpyne on Wednesday November 13, 2013 @01:19PM
(#6727148)
Contracts are usually public. Each companies bid for the contract is not, and in fact there are laws against government contracting officers letting such information become public, at least while the contract negotiation phase is still ongoing.
With respect to court documents: It could result is someone getting hurt or a mis-trial due to outside influences (ie. Rob Ford video)
There are obviously many reasons...