Re:MongoDB is to NoSQL like MySQL to SQL - in the most harmf...
by lucian1900 on Tuesday November 12, 2013 @06:23AM
(#6717111)
MySQL still isn't on par or better than its most comparable peer, Postgres. It's still nowhere near as terrible as Mongo, but let's not pretend it's amazing when it's merely serviceable.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:MongoDB is to NoSQL like MySQL to SQL - in the most harmf...
by amix on Tuesday November 12, 2013 @07:37AM
(#6717392)
Postgres got proper non-hackable replication in version 9... And it still isn't that great.
Re:MongoDB is to NoSQL like MySQL to SQL - in the most harmf...
by asdasf on Tuesday November 12, 2013 @02:48PM
(#6720435)
"Isn't that great" how? In that it imposes a bunch of limitations on you? Or that it frequently breaks and slaves have to be manually syned? Oh wait no, I was thinking of mysql.
Re:MongoDB is to NoSQL like MySQL to SQL - in the most harmf...
by regularfry on Tuesday November 12, 2013 @06:33AM
(#6717148)
MySQL replication is the one place it's got the edge.
Re:MongoDB is to NoSQL like MySQL to SQL - in the most harmf...
by ingrownpsyche on Tuesday November 12, 2013 @06:54AM
(#6717212)
Is it not the case that back in the day MySQL was better suited to running small to medium website backends with simple schemas out of the box? I know this hasn't been the case for a long time but I think it might be a contributing factor to MySQL's success.