News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A look beyond the Twitter IPO finds rot beneath the gloss... by tankenmate on Sunday November 10, 2013 @11:51AM (#6707222)
In January 1958 Walter Reuther gave testimony at a Senate subcommittee hearing, and he shared this anecdote;

In 1951, the Ford Motor Co. opened up a new engine plant in Cleveland, Ohio, adjacent to the municipal airport. It was the first fully automated engine plant. … I went through that plant many years back…

So they said to me, “Aren’t you worried about how you are going to collect union dues from all of these machines?”

I said, “the thought never occurred to me. The thought that occurred to me was how are you going to sell cars to these machines?” You know you can make automobiles, but consumers are still made in the good old fashioned way.”

Without good wages to provide the populace at large with cash to buy things growth will stagnate and wither. One of the big reasons that growth was so good during the 50's and 60's is that income was spread more evenly between capital and labour. If the trends that favour capital continue in the way that they have since the 80's then for 99%+ of us our children will have a much bleaker existence that we have had. Bringing back much higher income taxes for the very wealthy is one obvious way to rebalance this inequality.

Re:A look beyond the Twitter IPO finds rot beneath the gloss... by fidotron on Sunday November 10, 2013 @12:23PM (#6707383)
Growth was so good in the 50s and 60s because demand was so high from a range of countries that had just destroyed almost everything in them and needed to rebuild.

The rest here is just the usual luddite stuff reframed for a post-industrial revolution era.

Re:A look beyond the Twitter IPO finds rot beneath the gloss... by dantheman on Sunday November 10, 2013 @11:59AM (#6707268)
The reason growth was so great had nothing to do with high taxes; it had to do with the rest of the world being destroyed and technological changes.
Re:A look beyond the Twitter IPO finds rot beneath the gloss... by raws on Sunday November 10, 2013 @12:10PM (#6707325)
I believe he said growth was so great because riches was spread more evenly. Not high taxes, even though that was also the case.