News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:From a Model S owner in Tennessee by ruswick on Saturday November 09, 2013 @06:32PM (#6704087)
I don't understand how this is supposed to bolster Tesla's image.

The fact that the car alerted him to the fact that it was going to combust does not mean that it is OK that the car combusted.

Re:From a Model S owner in Tennessee by SeanLuke on Saturday November 09, 2013 @06:37PM (#6704126)
This seems to me to be a preemptive announcement.

Two fires are a PR problem, not an actual problem. But Tesla has a failure mode with their car that they need to address. It would appear that their "quarter inch armor plate" isn't thick enough to withstand a trailer hitch.

Re:From a Model S owner in Tennessee by eholder on Saturday November 09, 2013 @06:37PM (#6704130)
That's like saying the fire alarm waking you up at the middle of the night allowing you to safely escape does not mean it is OK that there is a fire burning your house down.

It is a true statement, but the situation is definitely preferable to having no notification.

Re:From a Model S owner in Tennessee by jthol on Saturday November 09, 2013 @09:38PM (#6704866)
Your analogy only holds if the fire alarm somehow started the fire.
Re:From a Model S owner in Tennessee by alandarev on Tuesday November 12, 2013 @08:36AM (#6717682)
Which is highly possible if it is collided with a same object same speed.