News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Swiss forensic report on Arafat's death by hedgie13 on Wednesday November 06, 2013 @03:47PM (#6685400)
> It was used on Alexander Litvinenko because the Russians wanted to show that they were able and willing to take the life of former agents that attacked their interests.

Or maybe not. It is very well known that Russian security services brutally murdered Litvinenko, but there is remarkably little evidence. The only evidence, in fact, is that "everyone knows it". What if new data will make you reconsider this well known wisdom?

> What motivates the use of a radioactive element that very few possess?

It is very widely used and easily available.

Re:Swiss forensic report on Arafat's death by ucha on Wednesday November 06, 2013 @04:08PM (#6685521)
Widely used? Easily available? Where and by who?
Re:Swiss forensic report on Arafat's death by bashinator on Wednesday November 06, 2013 @06:28PM (#6686345)
Re:Swiss forensic report on Arafat's death by capnrefsmmat on Wednesday November 06, 2013 @06:58PM (#6686509)
You'd need thousands of those button sources to make a lethal dose of Po-210.

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/po...

> They are typically in a form that, if ingested, would pose no health problem, and the radiation is so small that they do not pose a hazard even if the polonium were to be absorbed. It would take 30,000 of these exempt quantities to represent the 3-millicurie fatal dose estimate.

Button sources are typically of the size where you wouldn't mind letting undergrads gnaw on them during their physics labs. The worst they could do is choke.

Re:Swiss forensic report on Arafat's death by hedgie13 on Wednesday November 06, 2013 @04:26PM (#6685612)
Photographer brushes, textile mills, etc -- source of alpha radiation to get rid of static electricity.