Redshift looks to be order-of-magnitude faster than Impala or Shark in all the test. Does this mean that once RedShift supports user-defined functions, there is no competing solution that is any match? (Unless you want to avoid using the cloud)
In the "What's next?" section, they say they want to re-do the Impala tests using Parquet, which is a columnar format based on the Dremel whitepaper (http://parquet.io/).
Parquet was a joint effort between Cloudera and Twitter, and now it's being developed by many other companies. You can use it with Hive, Pig, MapReduce, Cascading, Crunch and I think Apache Drill's first milestone has adopted it as a columnar format as well. Parquet also allows you to use your Avro or Thrift schema (soon Protobuffs) to write Parquet data, too.
It's a separate project in the ecosystem and has its own roadmap (https://github.com/Parquet/parquet-mr).
Rcfile or parquet would be a more interesting benchmark.
"Here from HackerNews? This was originally posted several months ago. Check back in two weeks for an updated benchmark including newer versions of Hive, Impala, and Shark."
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/benchmark/