Re:Google’s Peter Norvig Offers Kind Words for Bing, Explora...
by ersi on Saturday June 20, 2009 @08:46AM
(#666381)
I agree, but the "summarised" version at "The noisy channel" was alright and I didn't feel it was "blogspam". It felt like it helped get me interested to read more, the original article has quite some more text than the summary - might have put me off. This got me interested.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google’s Peter Norvig Offers Kind Words for Bing, Explora...
by dtunkelang on Saturday June 20, 2009 @10:00AM
(#666419)
Thanks. I'm sensitive about parasitic blogging--in fact, I've blogged about it: http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/12/20/fair-use-and-seo/
In this instance, my genuine hope was to get people to read Jeremy's post, and an unsolicited email from Jeremy about his spike in traffic--which is how I found out that HN had picked up my post--assures me that I accomplished that.