Time to move on? The case against daylight saving time

Re:Time to move on? The case against daylight saving time by Qom on Saturday November 02, 2013 @06:10AM (#6658736)

Yes, but who gets the better time spots? People are already pissed that time zones are based on England's time, how angry do you think they will be when they get some illogical time zone while the anglo-saxons get to keep the am in the morning and the pm in the actual afternoon?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Time to move on? The case against daylight saving time by tempestn on Saturday November 02, 2013 @07:03AM (#6658838)

I expect if we were all going to convert to UTC anyway, we'd also convert to 24h time while we were at it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Time to move on? The case against daylight saving time by swombat on Saturday November 02, 2013 @08:51AM (#6659042)

So, redesign all the clock watch-faces to be 24h instead of 12h too?

And replace the wristwatch of everyone who doesn't have a digital watch? And wall clocks?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Time to move on? The case against daylight saving time by zuppy on Saturday November 02, 2013 @11:56AM (#6659569)

Why redesign the watches? This problem doesn't exist in the places that use the 24h format (like most of the world around North America). We can use both time formats. I can either say 9 in the evening or 21 and everybody gets it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Time to move on? The case against daylight saving time by swombat on Saturday November 02, 2013 @03:18PM (#6660336)

Because "9 in the evening" doesn't mean much when you're a quarter of the world from GMT and forced to use GMT as your universal time.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Time to move on? The case against daylight saving time by tempestn on Saturday November 02, 2013 @04:34PM (#6660675)

Well, when someone asks me what time it is now, I don't say, "The minute hand of my watch is pointing at the 1, and the hour hand slightly past the 3." Instead I translate it to "three-oh-five". Wouldn't be too much of a stretch to say 15:05 instead.

(My point being that many watches and clocks already don't give us the literal time as it's spoken, just a representation.)

Edit: although just to be clear, I don't actually think we should switch to a single time zone. It would cause all kinds of headaches. I just think if in some universe it were to happen, it would necessarily go along with a switch to 24h time.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Time to move on? The case against daylight saving time by swombat on Saturday November 02, 2013 @07:17PM (#6661281)

You can say 15:05 because you know it's the afternoon and so 3:05 translates to 15:05. Now think through how that works when the whole world is on a single timezone.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Time to move on? The case against daylight saving time by tempestn on Saturday November 02, 2013 @07:58PM (#6661420)

Yes, I agree that traveling would be hell with a single time zone regardless.

[ Parent | on HN ]