Re:A parser-combinator approach to parsing JSON
by CatDancer on Friday June 19, 2009 @06:38PM
(#665898)
I didn't quite follow, perhaps an example to help me? Is there a specific place where the code would become shorter?
Re:A parser-combinator approach to parsing JSON
by aufreak2 on Saturday June 20, 2009 @01:59AM
(#666187)
Each element of the returned list represents one way that the parser can "succeed". For example, if your parser is for the regexp "a+" and you give the string "aaabc", then the parser can return (("a" . "aabc") ("aa" . "abc") ("aaa" . "bc")] to say that it can interpret "aaabc" in 3 ways. You can transform this into the "longest" parse by filtering this list for the shortest "remaining string".
If your parser returns [] it means it cannot parse the string, so it all fits together. I don't know if I can find the time to rewrite the code to show you explicitly how this could help, but looking at Parsec (in Haskell) will give you a good idea of what I'm talking about
Re:A parser-combinator approach to parsing JSON
by CatDancer on Saturday June 20, 2009 @09:10AM
(#666391)
Very interesting! Would you use this for backtracking?
Re:A parser-combinator approach to parsing JSON
by aufreak2 on Saturday June 20, 2009 @02:15AM
(#666195)
My comment wasn't JSON specific. After all, the JSON spec was designed to support simple parsing logic from the start. My comment was more oriented towards generalization.
For one thing, you can write parsers that return more than one value - i.e. parsers that are ambiguous about how they parse the string they are given. That lets you express "longest" and "shortest" as parser combinators rather than some special operation for each parser.