News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:My really successful, unfundable, piece of shit startup I... by cwe on Friday November 01, 2013 @06:52PM (#6657062)
Why does he say "really successful" in the title, if it doesn't even break even?

EDIT: Must be the traffic, but these days that's not (that) impressive if there's no revenue model around it. That said, I'd love 6 million users/month.

EDIT 2: downvotes? I guess funding = success still around here, huh?

Re:My really successful, unfundable, piece of shit startup I... by alistairSH on Friday November 01, 2013 @06:57PM (#6657081)
The ten years included several startups. And while it appears all eventually failed or were put in the back-burner, he did raise $2 million in angel funding along the way. So, at least in regards to keeping himself housed and fed, I guess it was successful.
Re:My really successful, unfundable, piece of shit startup I... by dumbfounder on Friday November 01, 2013 @08:32PM (#6657539)
I actually meant to put successful in quotes but then forgot. The way I meant it is, if you had told me I would be seeing 6 million unique visitors per month when I first started out I would have definitely said that is a huge success. In some ways it is, but obviously not the most important way. I definitely agree that raising money is not success, and actually all of the money raised was prior to launching Twicsy.
Re:My really successful, unfundable, piece of shit startup I... by jff on Friday November 01, 2013 @06:54PM (#6657076)
I'd hate to have 6 million visitors a month if they're viewing pictures (high bandwidth) and I'm not actually making any money from them.
Re:My really successful, unfundable, piece of shit startup I... by lsc on Friday November 01, 2013 @11:49PM (#6658077)
eh, I'd take it. Bandwidth is cheap... and I have the sort of ego that derives a lot of pleasure from creating something that other people find useful and use.
Re:My really successful, unfundable, piece of shit startup I... by jbrandon52 on Friday November 01, 2013 @07:09PM (#6657151)
It appears the pictures are actually hosted on Twitter, so not that much traffic.