News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
[deleted]
Re:Clojure from the Ground Up, Part 2: Basic Types by aphyr on Sunday October 27, 2013 @12:38PM (#6622461)
Today I learned that I'm straight, Nancy Lynch is a man, and David Nolen is white.

Diverse engineers are all around us. They just go unnoticed--in part, because we interact with usernames and papers instead of face to face.

Re:Clojure from the Ground Up, Part 2: Basic Types by ivanpierre on Sunday October 27, 2013 @07:15PM (#6624109)
+1 :D
Re:Clojure from the Ground Up, Part 2: Basic Types by catwell on Sunday October 27, 2013 @12:35PM (#6622454)
This thread is so full of BS I shouldn't even bother commenting, but maybe you should just know that Kyle himself is openly gay...
Re:Clojure from the Ground Up, Part 2: Basic Types by lbarrow on Sunday October 27, 2013 @01:00PM (#6622520)
Good job assuming that anyone who writes an introduction to Clojure is a straight white dude. As it turns out, you're completely wrong.
Re:Clojure from the Ground Up, Part 2: Basic Types by theorique on Sunday October 27, 2013 @12:53PM (#6622496)
He's just signaling that he has the right beliefs about the right issues, and is therefore a modern righteous dude.

Perhaps we should create a compiler that works differently for men, women, members of visible minorities, gays/straights, transgendered folks and so forth. I'm sure this would be a great advance in computer science.

But, more seriously, this is actually one of the great things about exact sciences - they are objective and completely fair. A compiler or a mathematical proof or the laws of physics can't be racist or sexist.

Unfortunately, we can't say the same about the social systems surrounding these sciences - a university department or a corporation, or some of the individual members of these organizations, can, of course, have bias.

I don't know that the solution is injecting social justice content into technical discussions. It's probably fine to have a social track at a technical conference, where people know what they are getting into. But in the context of a technical lesson, it seems like derailing off topic.