News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Technology Change: .Net to Scala by seglo on Friday October 25, 2013 @11:59PM (#6616271)
We had two teams in separate physical locations. We worked together occasionally, but most of the time projects were fully staffed at one location or the other. The Scala change was fully supported at one of the office and not the other.

It wasn't too difficult to convince the CTO that Scala was the right choice. He's a big OSS advocate. From a technological perspective we were trusted to make the right decision.

I think what really sold the the rest of the management team was how much money we could save in licensing fees.

Re:Technology Change: .Net to Scala by powertower on Saturday October 26, 2013 @08:52PM (#6620215)
> I think what really sold the the rest of the management team was how much money we could save in licensing fees.

Come on, ...Microsoft licensing costs are a rounding error compared to the cost of developers.

Re:Technology Change: .Net to Scala by _random_ on Sunday October 27, 2013 @07:07AM (#6621567)
Well, some people are trying to save money even on free soda for developers - there were articles on HN.