News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ants: locks vs stm by sbt on Tuesday June 16, 2009 @03:39PM (#660752)
Yeah, this piece illustrates why Python is such a success and Lisp is not. Lambda may be the ultimate imperative, but certainly not the most convenient in many cases.
Re:Ants: locks vs stm by tc on Tuesday June 16, 2009 @03:45PM (#660764)
You're not serious? The loop macro is the most Pythonic aspect of CL (c.f. list comprehensions). Your trouble handling that loop has nothing to do with lambdas.
Re:Ants: locks vs stm by utx00 on Tuesday June 16, 2009 @04:31PM (#660844)
right, but i'm guessing his (and mine) trouble handling that loop has more to do with loop that it does with us - at least that's what i tell myself so please be gentle
Re:Ants: locks vs stm by itistoday on Tuesday June 16, 2009 @03:43PM (#660761)
You can write bad Python code too. Lisp is no longer one language, there are many Lisp variants that don't have CL's looping construct.
Re:Ants: locks vs stm by calpaterson on Wednesday June 17, 2009 @06:43AM (#661626)
Lisp hasn't been "one language" for decades, and, by number, most lisp variants do not include the loop macro. It's just a popular dialect that does.