News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:LinkedIn Intro: Doing the Impossible on iOS by baddox on Wednesday October 23, 2013 @04:19PM (#6601392)
Which parts would Apple have an issue with? The proxy server is the only part I can think of. Using images, CSS, and iframes in Mail is presumably a very deliberate feature.
Re:LinkedIn Intro: Doing the Impossible on iOS by boucher on Wednesday October 23, 2013 @11:02PM (#6603184)
I doubt they intended something like this to be possible, but what remains to see is whether or not they'll be OK with it. I wouldn't be surprised if Apple disabled :hover and other interactive CSS features within Mail.app in a future update.
Re:LinkedIn Intro: Doing the Impossible on iOS by notahacker on Wednesday October 23, 2013 @05:36PM (#6601887)
Apple has blocked apps for a lot less than providing a feature that intercepts users' email and email password to circumvent Apple's own sandboxing and inject content into their mailbox...
Re:LinkedIn Intro: Doing the Impossible on iOS by davidkclark on Wednesday October 23, 2013 @06:15PM (#6602120)
What could they do about it? Not allow you to create a mail account that points to linkedin.com as the server?
Re:LinkedIn Intro: Doing the Impossible on iOS by _garrett on Wednesday October 23, 2013 @07:43PM (#6602545)
Apple could yank the certificate that LinkedIn is using for configuration profiles, which would make installation significantly more difficult for the average user.
Re:LinkedIn Intro: Doing the Impossible on iOS by austinheap on Thursday October 24, 2013 @03:06AM (#6603773)
Apple, to my knowledge, has never revoked a single cert for config profiles since they're rarely used outside of the mobile dev market.

Any examples of them doing what you have proposed?

Re:LinkedIn Intro: Doing the Impossible on iOS by austinheap on Thursday October 24, 2013 @03:03AM (#6603767)
Uhm... Apple doesn't whitelist nor blacklist services -- read: TCP connections to whoever you want. LinkedIn, in this case, is well within Apple's TOS/EULA.

I think you're confused about the policies on their app store.