Re:Ogg founder moves to Mozilla to work on new video codec
by gillianseed on Tuesday October 22, 2013 @01:47PM
(#6593571)
I agree with this, I've never understood why Mozilla (are dragging their feet) when it comes to implementing webp.
It's hardly a huge maintenance burden, all development is done upstream and there's an easy to use c library implementation, and of course it's fully open source and royalty free.
And why is it so awful to add WebP to the list of image formats gif, jpg, png, but we can have a much longer list of supported audio codecs? What is different about audio? Or video for that matter? The argument seems rather arbitrary and self serving.