News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fructose: The Poison Index by Detrus on Tuesday October 22, 2013 @12:30AM (#6589790)
You're wrong on the internet.

The fructose being talked about isn't the nice one in fruits. It's corn syrup or sugar in soda. Yes, obese people consume incredible amounts of it. A gallon a day. Those Texas sized doses of soda you can order with your meal actually get consumed.

It's very difficult to consume even 1000 extra calories from proper food, like potatoes. They fill you up. And I can barely get a layer of fat. With soda you won't even notice the consumption. And it screws with insulin in the blood like fruits and potatoes never could. Makes you absorb more.

Some powerlifters eat junk food precisely because it contains more calories per stomach stuffing material. Ruins bloodwork but gets results. So do steroids.

Re:Fructose: The Poison Index by DanBC on Tuesday October 22, 2013 @02:56AM (#6590186)
Take that soda and replace the fructose with sucrose. You still get people drinking a gallon of it.

> It's very difficult to consume even 1000 extra calories from proper food, like potatoes.

This is just not true. People find it easy to overeat. They add a little bit of butter here, some mayo there, have a drizzle of salad dressing, a nice snack. It all adds up.

Re:Fructose: The Poison Index by grannyg00se on Tuesday October 22, 2013 @03:08AM (#6590220)
Detrus is talking about proper food. You're talking about butter and mayo.

A huge part of the problem is that people equate these things just as you have. Mayo in particular is an abomination. What we have come to accept as "food" is tragic[1].

[1]http://www.livestrong.com/slideshow/1007800-11-banned-food-i...

Re:Fructose: The Poison Index by chongli on Tuesday October 22, 2013 @03:22AM (#6590263)
Hey! There's only 57 calories in a tablespoon of mayo. If people are responsible and only use one or two tablespoons (to dip their fries, for example) then it is totally fine!

People need to learn to eat slower and really savour the food. Small portions of more intensely flavoured food is way better than huge, bulky meals of starch and meat and sugar. Whole grains too! I used to eat a half pound of regular pasta topped with several cups of cheap meat sauce. Now I eat 1/5 of a pound of whole grain multigrain pasta mixed with 3/4 cup of high quality marinara sauce (no meat) alongside a nice big salad (with minimal dressing). It tastes way better and is much healthier.

Re:Fructose: The Poison Index by DanBC on Tuesday October 22, 2013 @03:24AM (#6590271)
This thread is full of people saying that HFCS is the cause of obesity, and merely avoiding fructose will cure obesity.

We agree that fructose is not the only problem, and that people eat crap, regardless of hfcs.

Re:Fructose: The Poison Index by mordae on Tuesday October 22, 2013 @06:48AM (#6590895)
Yeah, but we have just now allowed to be fed even more poisonous stuff. It's neither positive nor irrelevant. It's a problem.
Re:Fructose: The Poison Index by atwebb on Tuesday October 22, 2013 @10:09AM (#6591961)
What's wrong with mayo? It's just eggs, oil, vinegar and a few spices. Seems pretty straightforward and far from an "abomination".

I mean don't eat it as a main course but throwing some into your chicken salad should be perfectly fine (and delicious...).

Re:Fructose: The Poison Index by nate_meurer on Tuesday October 22, 2013 @10:02AM (#6591917)
As usual, it's important to take pop-nutrition blurbs like this one with a grain of salt. Here's a counterpoint:

http://pipeline.corante.com/archives/2013/06/21/eight_toxic_...

Re:Fructose: The Poison Index by Detrus on Tuesday October 22, 2013 @01:29PM (#6593416)
I think sugar based soda had less sugar per gallon. With HFCS they changed the recipe and added more, even though it's sweeter. Makes people buy more. Not sure what the case is now with back to sugar changes.

What I had in mind was intentionally consuming 1000 calories of proper food on top of a diet that covers physical activity. Often 3-5000 calories. You know you're stuffing yourself then.

And assuming the butter and mayo aren't packed with extra sweetener or leptin suppressors, they're not a big deal. They won't cause insulin spikes. A drizzle of typical salad dressing is full of HFCS though. Gotta eat your vegetables!

But note that soda doses and recipes changed around 1990. That's also when the word fat didn't quite describe the state of a growing number of people. You can get fat on greasier food. Fatter on sugary sweets. But nothing digests faster and makes your body react like liquid packed with HFCS and salt. Salt makes you thirst for more and more HFCS blocks out its taste. That's how those bucket sized cups get consumed.

Re:Fructose: The Poison Index by sliverstorm on Tuesday October 22, 2013 @01:56AM (#6590012)
It's very difficult to consume even 1000 extra calories from proper food, like potatoes

No shit, that's nearly 6 medium russet potatoes.

Re:Fructose: The Poison Index by vinceguidry on Tuesday October 22, 2013 @09:23AM (#6591633)
Unless you french them and fry them in oil, then you just need two.
Re:Fructose: The Poison Index by smsm42 on Tuesday October 22, 2013 @04:25AM (#6590434)
Sugar has 50% fructose. HFCS has 42% to 55%, depending on variety. Are you sure the fructose in the corn syrup is the problem here?
Re:Fructose: The Poison Index by galenko on Tuesday October 22, 2013 @04:48AM (#6590519)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBnniua6-oM

It's a longer video (1h 30m), but it explains the problem with fructose in exactly as much detail as it needs and is very "average" people friendly.

Re:Fructose: The Poison Index by agumonkey on Wednesday October 23, 2013 @11:10AM (#6599184)
It's true that eating raw things pulls on all sorts of threshold triggering a strong stop reflex, whereas one can eat processed food for long periods without even half of this 'im fed up' sensation.