News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Wysiwtfftwomg by mden on Sunday October 20, 2013 @09:56PM (#6582727)
Contenteditable fails in many ways, but it's still something quite awesome and provides a good basis to build on. I built myself a wiki system because I find the current ones to be a huge pain to edit and I'm using contenteditable as the main tool. No need for separate editing pages, markup languages, or other nonsense - just click edit and make the changes immediately. I agree that contenteditable could have been way better, or in the very least more consistent between browsers.
Re:Wysiwtfftwomg by 3pt14159 on Sunday October 20, 2013 @10:55PM (#6582981)
At first I thought like you, until I started to deal with embed issues. For italics, bolding, and images, it works OK. Shitty to deal with handling some keyboard inputs, but not terrible. Beyond that, it is unmanageable though.