News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Microsoft blames Google and makes 'adjustments' to IE11 on Windows 8.1. Parent comment

Re:Microsoft blames Google and makes 'adjustments' to IE11 o... by SEMW on Saturday October 19, 2013 @05:11PM (#6577842)
The "action by Google" of maliciously adding themselves to a quirks-mode list[1] maintained solely by Microsoft, that Google had no access to or ability to add themselves to, when their website works perfectly well in IE11 if that list is disabled[2]?

[1] "What appears to be happening here is that Google’s search engine has somehow been added to IE11′s Compatibility View list."

[2] "Uncheck “Use Microsoft Compatibility lists” and Google’s search engine should work again."

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Microsoft blames Google and makes 'adjustments' to IE11 o... by Locke1689 on Saturday October 19, 2013 @05:40PM (#6577982)
That actually doesn't explain anything: "quirks" mode just emulates IE's old behavior and changes the user agent string to match. Old IE renders Google fine, so simply being in quirks mode shouldn't cause anything to break.

Disclaimer: Work at MS, I can't even see IE from my building, etc, etc.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Microsoft blames Google and makes 'adjustments' to IE11 o... by AaronFriel on Saturday October 19, 2013 @06:08PM (#6578097)
Slow down there - that list is hardly a "quirks-mode" list and there's no reason to believe a change in behavior was malicious by either party. You're assuming that list was recently changed by Microsoft for the purpose of what - ruining customer's experiences of using Windows 8.1? Tarnish Google's reputation?

There are so many assumptions at work here that I don't think it's reasonable to conclude any malice.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Microsoft blames Google and makes 'adjustments' to IE11 o... by SEMW on Saturday October 19, 2013 @09:58PM (#6578715)
> You're assuming that list was recently changed by Microsoft for the purpose of what - ruining customer's experiences of using Windows 8.1? Tarnish Google's reputation?

I'm not assuming that, and I haven't concluded malice on MS's part. I worded the comment to emphasize the ridiculousness of concluding malice on Google's part, but didn't mean to imply I thought there was malice the other way. Apologies if I misled you.

Relevant: Hanlon's razor[1].

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Microsoft blames Google and makes 'adjustments' to IE11 o... by AaronFriel on Sunday October 20, 2013 @10:01AM (#6579907)
Apologies to you then - and I'm fond of Hanlon's razor myself.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Microsoft blames Google and makes 'adjustments' to IE11 o... by jfoster on Saturday October 19, 2013 @06:52PM (#6578263)
Not to mention the huge negative effect it must have on Google's short-term revenue to do such a thing intentionally. I suppose it could be argued that longer term it may make sense for Google to break IE in order to increase Chrome's market share, and thereby increase the number of users defaulted to Google search. Would be very risky, though.
[ Parent | on HN ]