To an alarming degree, science is not self-correcting

Re:To an alarming degree, science is not self-correcting by guscost on Thursday October 17, 2013 @07:22PM (#6568835)

Thanks for avoiding the strawman "denier" nonsense, but I think you're looking for the phrase "CAGW-informed-legislation critics."

Why would a rational person criticize the assumption that climate changes?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:To an alarming degree, science is not self-correcting by pbhjpbhj on Friday October 18, 2013 @11:18AM (#6571842)

"Climate change" in this context is short-hand for "human modified climate change" and generally refers to climate change accelerated by human production of CO2.

That said, criticising assumptions is perfectly rational.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:To an alarming degree, science is not self-correcting by guscost on Saturday October 19, 2013 @09:37AM (#6576342)

Perhaps I meant to say "practical person" instead.

[ Parent | on HN ]