News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ubuntu 13.10 (Saucy Salamander) by asveikau on Thursday October 17, 2013 @04:27PM (#6567909)
I guess I should stop using my Debian machines where I did an install in previous decades (decades, plural) and copied the setup from hard drive to hard drive across several physical machine rebuilds. Up to now I had no idea that this never works smoothly.
Re:Ubuntu 13.10 (Saucy Salamander) by Daishiman on Friday October 18, 2013 @12:40AM (#6569803)
If you're the sort of person that likes to try out stuff from different places, including compiled binaries, non-repo packages, and other fun stuff, eventually stuff will break. A lot of desktop pieces of software have config files that keep changing.

I've found that keeping your old /home around and a copy of installed packages works well enough for most situations.

Re:Ubuntu 13.10 (Saucy Salamander) by asveikau on Friday October 18, 2013 @11:13AM (#6571805)
Actually I do keep around a few old binaries, and I have more often seen something else: software that no longer compiles with a modern compiler, but the binary I built in 2000 still works.
Re:Ubuntu 13.10 (Saucy Salamander) by kolev on Thursday October 17, 2013 @08:42PM (#6569129)
Debian != Ubuntu
Re:Ubuntu 13.10 (Saucy Salamander) by asveikau on Thursday October 17, 2013 @09:45PM (#6569301)
So?
Re:Ubuntu 13.10 (Saucy Salamander) by kolev on Thursday October 17, 2013 @10:48PM (#6569496)
We're talking about Ubuntu here - that was my point.

I've been upgrading Ubuntu Desktop for years (a decade, singular) and I've always been struggling - especially if I ventured to install an alpha and then keep upgrading that. Compared to OS X, on which I always upgrade to the first Developer Preview and keep upgrading on, although OS X comes with problems, too, the GM usually fixes it all up. With Ubuntu, it's best to script your environment and rebuild clean. At least my experience. Garbage always piles up otherwise!

Re:Ubuntu 13.10 (Saucy Salamander) by asveikau on Friday October 18, 2013 @11:17AM (#6571834)
And my point was that you shouldn't let one distro's failures set your expectations so low that this is acceptable and normal.