News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Damn you, Bobby Tables. by cstejerean on Wednesday October 10, 2007 @01:54AM (#65686)
I really enjoyed this, I'm not sure why people are complaining. I don't tend to watch the top 20 anyway and mostly stick to the watching the stream of new posts.
Re:Damn you, Bobby Tables. by vegashacker on Wednesday October 10, 2007 @05:05PM (#65996)
I hate comics. Hate 'em. And OMG, that was the funniest thing I think I've ever read. Little Bobby Tables. I love it.
Re:Damn you, Bobby Tables. by akardell on Wednesday October 10, 2007 @08:30PM (#66089)
This one was especially funny for me since I was just part of a company that wrote student information systems -- the software that is used to track student records in K-12 schools. Fortunately, we were using prepared statements :)
Re:Damn you, Bobby Tables. by budu3 on Wednesday October 10, 2007 @01:17AM (#65675)
Oh no. It's reddit all over again.
Re:Damn you, Bobby Tables. by david on Wednesday October 10, 2007 @01:25AM (#65676)
Complete with people complaining every time a link they don't like gets on the front page for a while.
Re:Damn you, Bobby Tables. by mynameishere on Wednesday October 10, 2007 @01:34AM (#65677)
Complete with self-obsessed meta-discussions.

Okay, a variation on the thing I've been saying for a while now: When a link gets into the top twenty, THEN give us a down arrow.

Re:Damn you, Bobby Tables. by myoung8 on Wednesday October 10, 2007 @03:43AM (#65718)
It's on topic. It's funny. I don't see the problem here...
Re:Damn you, Bobby Tables. by BrandonM on Wednesday October 10, 2007 @12:39PM (#65863)
I think people are complaining because xkcd is a high-quality site that everyone knows about (and likely reads already). In other words, just about every comic on the site could be submitted here, but most of us refrain from doing that.

Then again, the same thing could be said for PG's essays, but I guess in that case, there's always some kind of discussion to go along with them, whereas there's not much to say about a comic.

Re:Damn you, Bobby Tables. by Goladus on Wednesday October 10, 2007 @06:46PM (#66051)
xkcd is updated 3 times a week on schedule. That there is a new one is not news. (This one is at least sort of about hacking.)

PG posts maybe 2 essays in a month. It is news when a new essay is posted. That goes for many bloggers who only update periodically.

Re:Damn you, Bobby Tables. by plusbryan on Wednesday October 10, 2007 @04:47PM (#65983)
And, sadly, they don't come every day.
Re:Damn you, Bobby Tables. by Tichy on Thursday October 11, 2007 @02:49AM (#66175)
I find that many blogs in my newsreader I still read mostly through YC news submissions. I don't read all the blogs in my reader on a regular basis, and somehow I count on YC news to notify me if something especially interesting appears in them.
Re:Damn you, Bobby Tables. by dbrush on Thursday October 11, 2007 @01:56AM (#66159)
I wonder if some of the people complaining about notable items appearing on the front page of Reddit are some of the same people complaining about non-notable items appearing on obscure pages within Wikipedia.
Re:Damn you, Bobby Tables. by jamiequint on Wednesday October 10, 2007 @03:56PM (#65953)
so is techcrunch but that doesnt stop anyone
Re:Damn you, Bobby Tables. by Tichy on Thursday October 11, 2007 @02:47AM (#66174)
I don't read reddit...