Don't take this the wrong way but $5/month for a single static site is crazy expensive. I understand wanting to have a sustainable business but for $5 you should give customers 20-30 sites IMO.

Ha. But you're not paying $5 a month for a static site, you're paying for a sustainable business to be behind your website when things go awry.

$5 a month is cheap, too cheap in fact.

Yeah, I have to disagree. Hosting a static site costs the provider practically nothing. Apache or Nginx can chew through requests for static content like it's nothing. $5 is prohibitively expensive because static sites are often one-off projects that you don't want to have to worry about. If I'm paying $5 for each one then I would worry about it.

You don't just get a static site though. We handle all the whole build process: minifying, bundling, image optimization, giving each asset a unique content based URL and pushing them all to Akamai.

BitBalloon also makes forms work without having to do any brackens programming (or fitting in an external form service and try to get it to look like part of your site).

There's lots more timesavers included as well, so if your time is with anything to you, those $60 for a year of hosting will pay for themselves.

You are pricing in terms of cost. The provider is pricing in terms of value to the customer.