News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Hacker News is a social echo chamber by simias on Tuesday October 15, 2013 @12:18PM (#6554194)
I think the problem is that some people are not as thoughtful as you are when it comes to up/downvotes. The terrible "downvote because I disagree" is not as bad as in other forums but it's definitely on the rise. When people use the voting system to express an opinion instead of judging the quality of the comment itself it kills the quality of the discussion very very quickly in my experience.

The people who don't take the voting system seriously are probably those who are the most likely to mindlessly upvote/downvote stories and comments.

I think up and down votes should be rationed. Or at least have some kind of cost (when your ratio is depleted you can upvote by using your own karma?). I remember slashdot had (has?) a similar system. It would force the users to think twice before mindlessly up or down voting anything. Maybe a downvote should be more expensive as an upvote, even.

Flagging stories would still be free for completely off topic contents (and fighting voting rings).

EDIT: or as an alternative: the more you vote the less your vote is meaningful.

Re:Hacker News is a social echo chamber by kutakbash on Tuesday October 15, 2013 @01:08PM (#6554623)
Voting system is a great cleaning mechanism (akin to current in a pond), something that keeps mediocre submissions and poor comments out of sight. If this feature is rationed (eg flow of the current is weakened), comments and posts ought to be rationed as well, otherwise HN gets overwhelmed with poor input.
Re:Hacker News is a social echo chamber by simias on Tuesday October 15, 2013 @02:18PM (#6555248)
It means the votes will be more meaningful. Unless the ratio of votes/comments gets really really low it wouldn't be much of an issue I think. This can even be tuned dynamically.