News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Open access: The true cost of science publishing. Parent comment

Re:Open access: The true cost of science publishing by scientist on Sunday October 13, 2013 @02:21PM (#6543553)
Such a cross-journal database that allows scientists to share ratings and reviews is Epistemio (http://www.epistemio.com/).
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Open access: The true cost of science publishing by niels_olson on Sunday October 13, 2013 @03:19PM (#6543783)
probably more subversive to drop arXiv''s existing content into an instance of GitHub and conform the user interface to the existing arXiv U/I. Or, actually, just keep the colors and stick with Github's UI.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Open access: The true cost of science publishing by yeukhon on Sunday October 13, 2013 @06:34PM (#6544390)
Github UI? Before forcing everything to look like github, please, please, remember the term "user experience research". Github UI has major issues and they keep improving. If every open website has a github UI, that's gon to be like seeing every website running default bootstrap interface. No.
[ Parent | on HN ]