Re:Natural born programmers
by silentbicycle on Friday October 11, 2013 @10:49AM
(#6533444)
Sure. The error in your reasoning is that you greatly mischaracterize his point, which is that the concept of the natural-born "10x programmer" is quite destructive.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Natural born programmers
by yummyfajitas on Friday October 11, 2013 @10:54AM
(#6533489)
How did I mischaracterize it? From my post: "The article provides lots of evidence that women react badly to this belief..."
Do you disagree that the original author characterizes the belief as false, in addition to destructive?
Re:Natural born programmers
by silentbicycle on Friday October 11, 2013 @11:13AM
(#6533620)
The effect is not specific to women. The paper he linked is, but it also has a bibliography.
I'm not wasting any more time debating this with you. Cheers.