Re:Ask HN: what unwanted domain names are you sitting on?
by htsh on Thursday June 11, 2009 @03:14PM
(#653395)
I think its fine as long is at doesn't in any way suggest approval or endorsement of the President.. Public figures are pretty much fair game. The question is whether the "manipulated in any way" is modified by "that in any way suggest approval." The way this clause is constructed, I would read it as such.
Re:Ask HN: what unwanted domain names are you sitting on?
by randallsquared on Thursday June 11, 2009 @02:51PM
(#653358)
That's what hosting in The Netherlands is for.
Re:Ask HN: what unwanted domain names are you sitting on?
by SkyMarshal on Thursday June 11, 2009 @10:19PM
(#654064)
Bad idea. Since Obama's not only a Muslim but the second coming of the prophet Abraham, peace be upon him, he'll murder anyone who blasphemes his picture.
Re:Ask HN: what unwanted domain names are you sitting on?
by fredBuddemeyer on Thursday June 11, 2009 @03:44PM
(#653443)
actually played this card even further once with billboards of bush http://www.bigredwire.com/images/photos/bush_sign.gif and a quote we put in his mouth. some newspapers balked but nary a word from w. everyone else loved it.
edit: "The photograph may not be manipulated in any way or used in materials, advertisements, products, or promotions that in any way suggest approval or endorsement of the President, the First Family, or the White House."
maybe not.