News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Comcast Intercepts and Redirects Port 53 Traffic by sounddust on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @09:21AM (#650934)
After 439 comments on Slashdot, and not a single person being able to replicate the results here or on slashdot, I think it's time to kill this story as inaccurate.

Edit: even the original author of the article is claiming "it doesn't happen anymore." It's probably an issue with his testing/setup rather than comcast.

Re:Comcast Intercepts and Redirects Port 53 Traffic by gasull on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @12:28PM (#651262)
I agree, but I can't delete the story anymore (there's no link).
Re:Comcast Intercepts and Redirects Port 53 Traffic by ScottWhigham on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @07:16AM (#650818)
I hadn't seen the Netalyzer before - damn impressive. Among the impressive results was a "Minor aberration: Your computer's clock is 17ms too fast."
Re:Comcast Intercepts and Redirects Port 53 Traffic by tlrobinson on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @06:19AM (#650784)
Can anyone actually reproduce this? According to numerous comments on the /. article (including one from a Comcast representative) this is not true.
Re:Comcast Intercepts and Redirects Port 53 Traffic by obvioustroll on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @06:52AM (#650800)
I'm a comcast customer who uses opendns, and I could not reproduce this behavior.
Re:Comcast Intercepts and Redirects Port 53 Traffic by eli on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @08:38AM (#650886)
Netalyzer gave a message about port 53, but I'm clearly still using openDNS, so I dunno.
Re:Comcast Intercepts and Redirects Port 53 Traffic by spectre on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @06:34AM (#650791)
People believed it because it sounds like something Comcast would actually do.
Re:Comcast Intercepts and Redirects Port 53 Traffic by jmtame on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @05:53AM (#650774)
I got this: Direct UDP access to remote DNS servers (port 53) is allowed.
Re:Comcast Intercepts and Redirects Port 53 Traffic by TrevorJ on Wednesday June 10, 2009 @09:10AM (#650918)
I read through a lot of the comments on this story, and it appears that it's been problematic to replicate.